New Delhi [India], October 3 (ANI): India should focus on taxing capital income such as corporate profits, dividends and realised capital gains rather than imposing taxes on wealth or inheritance, economist Daniel Waldenström said, arguing that such an approach would allow the country to address inequality without creating excessive hurdles to investment and savings.
Waldenström, Professor at the Research Institute of Industrial Economics, said on Saturday that capital should be taxed just as labour is taxed, but cautioned against levies on the underlying value of wealth.
“I think it's important that we tax capital, of course, as we also tax labour. The problem is that taxing capital is difficult. I think we should focus on capital income taxation,” Waldenström told ANI.
Explaining his preferred approach, he said taxes should apply when companies generate profits or when owners earn income from their investments.
“So when companies make profits, we should tax that. That's the corporate tax, or when owners take out money from their firms, dividends, or realised capital gains, we should not tax the values as such,” he said.
Waldenström argued that wealth and inheritance taxes had proved difficult to operate effectively in several countries.
“So inheritance and wealth are poorly functioning capital taxes. We have used them, as many countries have, and they have abolished them and hollowed them out,” he said.
“Instead, tax capital income, profits, revenues or interests; that is the way forward alongside of taxing labour and consumption,” he added.
His comments came while discussing wealth inequality in India and how policy could broaden participation in economic growth.
Waldenström said rising wealth among successful business owners was not in itself the central problem, provided more people were able to participate in the gains generated by productive companies.
“The problem is not that we get a few rich business owners that are successful, but the problem is how to get more people to get included in that, how to lift the bottom,” he said.
He advocated wider access to education, household savings and investment through financial markets and mutual funds, along with a stronger funded pension system.
Waldenström also cautioned that taxes should not become so high that they discourage saving and investment.
“Taxes cannot be too high, we cannot have too high hurdles into saving into the stock market,” he said.
India’s current income-tax framework already taxes income from dividends and capital gains, with separate provisions applying to different categories of capital gains.
Waldenström said India’s broader economic outlook remained promising, adding that pro-growth policies were important for job creation, household incomes and government revenues needed to finance infrastructure and human capital. (ANI)
India should tax capital income, not wealth or inheritance: Economist Daniel Waldenström
